asp tutorials, asp.net tutorials, sample code, and Microsoft news from 15Seconds
Data Access  |   Troubleshooting  |   Security  |   Performance  |   ADSI  |   Upload  |   Email  |   Control Building  |   Component Building  |   Forms  |   XML  |   Web Services  |   ASP.NET  |   .NET Features  |   .NET 2.0  |   App Development  |   App Architecture  |   IIS  |   Wireless
 
Pioneering Active Server
 Power Search





Active News
15 Seconds Weekly Newsletter
• Complete Coverage
• Site Updates
• Upcoming Features

More Free Newsletters
Reference
News
Articles
Archive
Writers
Code Samples
Components
Tools
FAQ
Feedback
Books
Links
DL Archives
Community
Messageboard
List Servers
Mailing List
WebHosts
Consultants
Tech Jobs
15 Seconds
Home
Site Map
Press
Legal
Privacy Policy
internet.commerce














internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology
International

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

HardwareCentral
Compare products, prices, and stores at Hardware Central!

Tuning Up ADO.NET Connection Pooling in ASP.NET Applications
By Dmitri Khanine
Rating: 4.1 out of 5
Rate this article


  • email this article to a colleague
  • suggest an article

    Connection Pooling Basics

    Opening a database connection is a resource intensive and time consuming operation. Connection pooling increases the performance of Web applications by reusing active database connections instead of creating a new connection with every request. Connection pool manager maintains a pool of open database connections. When a new connection requests come in, the pool manager checks if the pool contains any unused connections and returns one if available. If all connections currently in the pool are busy and the maximum pool size has not been reached, the new connection is created and added to the pool. When the pool reaches its maximum size all new connection requests are being queued up until a connection in the pool becomes available or the connection attempt times out.

    Connection pooling behavior is controlled by the connection string parameters. The following are four parameters that control most of the connection pooling behavior:

    • Connect Timeout - controls the wait period in seconds when a new connection is requested, if this timeout expires, an exception will be thrown. Default is 15 seconds.
    • Max Pool Size - specifies the maximum size of your connection pool. Default is 100. Most Web sites do not use more than 40 connections under the heaviest load but it depends on how long your database operations take to complete.
    • Min Pool Size - initial number of connections that will be added to the pool upon its creation. Default is zero; however, you may chose to set this to a small number such as 5 if your application needs consistent response times even after it was idle for hours. In this case the first user requests won't have to wait for those database connections to establish.
    • Pooling - controls if your connection pooling on or off. Default as you may've guessed is true. Read on to see when you may use Pooling=false setting.

    Common Problems and Resolutions

    Connection pooling problems are almost always caused by a "connection leak" - a condition where your application does not close its database connections correctly and consistently. When you "leak" connections, they remain open until the garbage collector (GC) closes them for you by calling their Dispose method. Unlike old ADO, ADO.NET requires you to manually close your database connections as soon as you're done with them. If you think of relying on connection objects to go out of scope, think again. It may take hours until GC collects them. In the mean time your app may be dead in the water, greeting your users or support personnel with something like this:

    Exception: System.InvalidOperationException Message: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached. Source: System.Data at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionPoolManager.GetPooledConnection(SqlConnectionString options, Boolean& isInTransaction) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() ...

    Exception: System.InvalidOperationException
    Message: Timeout expired.  The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool.  This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
    Source: System.Data

    at  System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionPoolManager.GetPooledConnection(SqlConnectionString options, Boolean& isInTransaction)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()

    Closing your connections

    When you intend to close your database connection, you want to make sure that you are really closing it. The following code looks fine yet causes a connection leak:

         SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(myConnectionString);

          conn.Open();

          doSomething();

          conn.Close();                

    If doSomething() throws an exception - conn will never get explicitly closed. Here is how this can be corrected:

         SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(myConnectionString);

          try

          {

                conn.Open();

                doSomething(conn);

          }

          finally

    {

                conn.Close();                

          }

    or

         using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(myConnectionString))

          {

                conn.Open();

                doSomething(conn);

          }

    Did you notice that in the first example we called conn.Close() explicitly while in the second one we make the compiler generate an (implicit) call to conn.Dispose() immediately following the using block? The C# using block guarantees that the Dispose method is called on the subject of the using clause immediately after the block ends. Close and Dispose methods of Connection object are equivalent. Neither one gives you any specific advantages over the other.

    When returning a connection from a class method - make sure you cache it locally and call its Close method. The following code will leak a connection:

    OleDbCommand cmd new OleDbCommand(myUpdateQuery, getConnection());

          intres = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();

         getConnection().Close(); // The connection returned from the first call to getConnection() is not being closed. Instead of closing your connection, this line creates a new one and tries to close it.

    If you use SqlDataReader, OleDbDataReader, etc., close them. Even though closing the connection itself seems to do the trick, put in the extra effort to close your data reader objects explicitly when you use them.

    Last but not the least, never Close or Dispose your connection or any other managed object in the class destructor or your Finalize method. This not only has no value in closing your connections but also interferes with the garbage collector and may cause errors. For more information see http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/cpguide/html/cpconprogrammingessentialsforgarbagecollection.asp.

    Testing your changes

    The only way to know the effect of your changes on connection pooling behavior is to load-test your application. If you have existing unit tests - use them. Running your unit tests repeatedly in a loop may create a fair bit of stress on application. If you don't, use the Web load testing tool. There are plenty of commercial load testing tools on the market. If you prefer freeware, consider OpenSTA available at www.opensta.org. All you need to setup your load test is to install the tool, bring up your Web application and click your way through. OpenSTA will record your HTTP requests into test scenarios that you can run as part of your load test.

    Knowing that your application crashes under the load doesn't often help to locate the problem. If the app crashes fairly quickly, all you may need to do is run several load tests - one for each module and see which one has a problem. However, if it takes hours to crash you will have to take a closer look.

    Monitoring connection pooling behavior

    Most of the time you just need to know if your application manages to stay within the size of its connection pool. If the load doesn't change, but the number of connections constantly creep even after the initial "warm-up" period, you are most likely dealing with a connection leak. The easiest way to monitor the number of database connections is by using the Performance Monitor available under Administrative tools on most Windows installations. If you are running SQL Server, add SQL Server General Statistics -> User Connections performance counter (The counter is available on the SQL Server machine so you may need to put its name or IP address into the Select Counters From Computer box). The other way to monitor the number of database connections is by querying your DBMS. For example, on SQL Server run:

    EXEC SP_WHO

    Or on Oracle, run:

    SELECT * FROM V$SESSION WHERE PROGRAM IS NOT NULL

    .NET CLR Data performance counters

    In documentation you may run into .Net CLR Data performance counters. They are great if you know what they can and cannot do. Keep in mind that they do not always reset properly. The following KB article sheds some light on the problem but in my opinion does not cover all the issues: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314429. Another thing to keep in mind is that IIS unloads app domains under stress so don't be surprised when your number of database connections has dropped to zero while your min pool size is five!

    Short term fixes

    What if you discovered the connection pooling issue in production and you cannot take it offline to troubleshoot? Turn pooling off. Even though your app will take a performance hit, it shouldn't crash! Your memory footprint will also grow. What if it doesn't crash all that often, and you don't want to take a performance hit? Try this:

    conn = new SqlConnection();

    try

    {

      conn.ConnectionString = "integrated security=SSPI;SERVER=YOUR_SERVER;DATABASE=YOUR_DB_NAME;Min Pool Size=5;Max Pool Size=60;Connect Timeout=2;";     // Notice Connection Timeout set to only two seconds!

      conn.Open();

    }

    catch(Exception)

    {

      if (conn.State != ConnectionState.Closed) conn.Close();

      conn.ConnectionString = "integrated security=SSPI;SERVER=YOUR_SERVER;DATABASE=YOUR_DB_NAME;Pooling=false;Connect Timeout=45;";

      conn.Open();

    If I fail to open a pooled connection within two seconds, I am trying to open a non-pooled connection. This introduces a two second delay when no pooled connections are available, but if your connection leak doesn't show most of the time, this is a good steam valve.

    Conclusion

    In this article you've learned that the most common cause of connection pooling issues is database connections that are left open or not closed properly. You've learned that when you type "conn.Close()", you almost always want to put that in the "Finally" block. You also learned not to interfere with the class destructor unless you use unmanaged resources. You've learned how to monitor your connection pool and diagnose a potential problem. You also learned how to keep a system with a connection leak in production if you really have to, until the problem is resolved. I hope this article has helped you resolve your connection pooling issue. However, there is more to connection pooling that is not covered in this article. Check out Bill Vaughn's "Swimming in the .NET connection pool" at http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/38356/38356.html.

    About the Author

    Dmitri Khanine is senior web developer and architect working for a major Canadian Bank. His 10+ years of experience are mostly in backend and middle tier development of enterprise Web applications on Microsoft as well as J2EE platforms. Industry experience includes Banking, Finance, Automotive and software consulting. Dmitri's areas of interest and expertise include rapid enterprise application development, MVC frameworks and code generation. Dmitri can be contacted at Khanine@hotmail.com.

  • Rate This Article
    Not HelpfulMost Helpful
    1 2 3 4 5
    Supporting Products/Tools
    Proposion N2N
    Proposion N2N connects Microsoft .NET applications to Lotus Notes and Lotus Domino databases. This ADO.NET managed data provider allows you to perform blindingly fast queries and updates of Notes data from ASP.NET pages, .NET web services, Windows, or Mobile applications. An innovative SQL-like query language leverages the unique features of Notes and makes collaborative software accessible to relational database programmers.
    [Top]
    Other Articles
    Sep 15, 2005 - Building an Image Keyword System
    Unlike text-based file formats image files aren't made up of words, which makes searching for an image file by keyword difficult. Instead of being able to simply open the file to see what it contains, we're stuck looking at the text around it and other metadata to determine the image's meaning. In this article, Ziran Sun shows you how to build a simple database-based image keyword system that allows you to associate keywords with images and use these keywords to make finding images easier.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Apr 7, 2005 - A Step-by-Step Guide To Using MySQL with ASP.NET - Part 2
    In the second part of of his article on using MySQL with ASP.NET, Ziran Sun covers how to add a new MySQL user to the database server, assign the user the appropriate permissions, connect to the database, and build a simple ASP.NET page to perform a query.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Feb 10, 2005 - A Step-by-Step Guide To Using MySQL with ASP.NET - Part 1
    Back in the days of classic ASP, if you were building a database-driven web site, your choice was either to invest a lot of money to get a copy of Microsoft SQL Server (or some other enterprise-ready database) or invest a lot of time finding a way to deal with the performance and scalability limitations of Microsoft Access. Luckily these days there's another viable alternative: MySQL.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Jan 27, 2005 - Moving a Database from SQL Server 7.0 to SQL Server 2000
    Moving or copying a SQL Server database from one machine to another requires a lot of preparation in order to ensure a smooth transfer. In this article, Dina Fleet Berry examines the different methods and highlights the different issues associated with each of them.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Jan 6, 2005 - Debugging a SQL Stored Procedure from inside SQL Server 2000 Query Analyzer
    There are many times when using SQL Server 2000 Query Analyzer to debug SQL statements is a better choice than debugging in Visual Studio .NET. In this article, Dina Fleet Berry explains why and walks you through the debugging process step-by step.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Nov 24, 2004 - Persisting .NET Objects to SQL Server Using SQLXML and Serialization
    As a follow up to his article on retrieving objects from SQL Server using SQLXML and serialization, Gianluca Nuzzo discusses saving objects back to SQL Server using a schema definition file and updategrams.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Sep 14, 2004 - Transaction Processing in ADO.NET 2.0
    One area that stands out when comparing ADO.NET 1.x to ADO.NET 2.0 is transaction processing. Bill Ryan shows just how easy transaction processing has become with the TransactionScope object in ADO.NET 2.0.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Sep 8, 2004 - Custom Object Data Binding with .NET
    Developers often use brute force coding to marshal data between the GUI and application objects. In this article, Luther Stanton explains how to use .NET's out-of-the box data-binding functionality to make this job much easier.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Sep 2, 2004 - Queue MSMQ Messages from SQL Server
    Learn how to create a console application to queue a message in Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) and then use an extended stored procedure to call the console application from a SQL Server trigger.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Jul 13, 2004 - Retrieving Objects from SQL Server Using SQLXML and Serialization
    This article will describe how to design a data access layer for a set of entities. You'll learn how to write an XSD schema and design two simple helper classes -- one for reading an XML stream from SQL Server using SQLXML and another for deserializing the XML stream.
    [Read This Article]  [Top]
    Mailing List
    Want to receive email when the next article is published? Just Click Here to sign up.

    Support the Active Server Industry



    JupiterOnlineMedia

    internet.comearthweb.comDevx.commediabistro.comGraphics.com

    Search:

    Jupitermedia Corporation has two divisions: Jupiterimages and JupiterOnlineMedia

    Jupitermedia Corporate Info


    Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions, Privacy Policy.

    Advertise | Newsletters | Tech Jobs | Shopping | E-mail Offers